Over at the CF Mothership earlier today, I said this:
As I’ve been repeating for lo, these last several years, in my opinion July 4th should properly be a national day of mourning, not of celebration. But honestly, I can’t help but be of two minds (at least) on that. Yes, we have utterly failed in our duty to uphold the documents of America’s Founding, the Declaration and the Constitution. That being the case, however, it does NOT necessarily follow that the ideals, the principles, the bedrock definitional values of the Founding are not themselves worth celebrating, each and every year from now until Doomsday. Yes, even when we have a senile, corrupt old grifter roosting in the Oval Office.
So over the last cpl-three days I’ve been engaged in an internal tug of war over which direction I should take with this year’s Independence Day offering, both here and over at the Eyrie—which, in the usual run of things, I would’ve already finished by now.
I dunno, would you say that the title of this post maybe gives away which way I might be leaning here? Or no?
Fact is, it really is difficult to know where we are in America today. As you CF Lifers will recall, this blog was born in the immediate wake of the 9/11/01 atrocities; the domain name was registered on 9/14, if I remember right. Being a complete newcomer to this whole “blogging” phenomenon, I had no clue about the dominant bloggerware systems back then—GreyMatter, Moveable Type, etc. No clue? Hell, I didn’t even know such things existed in those earliest days.
So I whipped up a design for this crazy new trip I was embarking on over the next two days; Adobe GoLive (version 4? Or 5, maybe?) was my WYSIWYG web-design weapon of choice in those Aulden Thymes. The very first CF posts went up on 9/16/01. I had screenshots of that first effort stored on one of my old Macs, but alas, they’re gone with the wind now.
The one thing I know for sure: the America we lived in then bore little, if any, resemblance to the one we’re living in today. It’s incredible to realize just how drastically the US has changed in such a relatively short span of time. In fact, I doubt that there’s been any other twenty year span that DID see such radical, sweeping change to both the nation and its culture in our long history, with the Civil War v1.0/Reconstruction era being a possible exception.
Think of it: the very definition of so many of the words in our common language is now the exact opposite of what we once understood them to mean. The fundamental concept of what constitutes a man and a woman is in ferocious dispute. Half the country now takes it as read that the so-called “mainstream” media as well as the central government itself lies not merely occasionally but continually, reflexively—as if our national institutions were incapable of honesty and forthrightness. The short-lived spasm of national unity, purpose, and patriotic feeling right after the 9/11 attacks is beyond the wildest imagining today.
The Left has succumbed so completely to the unlovely temptations of radicalization, authoritarianism, and willful ignis fatuus that the very idea of living peacefully alongside them as friends, neighbors, and fellow countrymen with whom we might disagree on certain specific issues has come to feel like an absurdity, neither possible nor even particularly desirable.
The basic assumption now on the part of increasing numbers on both sides is not of an ongoing Union from sea to shining sea—however contentious and/or quarrelsome we might be among ourselves at times—but of conflict, violence, and, eventually, schism of one sort or another.
When freedom, individual self-determination, and the concept of natural rights themselves have all become points of intense dispute and conflict rather than shared values held in highest esteem by all Americans…well, can we still lay serious claim to being a country at all? Certainly, we’ve blown right past all that silly “one nation, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all” bushwa greybeards like myself once recited in school, and left it choking in our dust.
Independence Day, like so many other precious and unique touchstones of American life—the Declaration, the Constitution, the Revolution, for starters—has been reduced to mere anachronism and irrelevance. Yes, there will always be a dwindling minority of us who will still reverence it, and take time out from our July 4th revelry to reflect on its deeper significance. We must always hold out hope that one day, after the awful reckoning that looms over us has passed into history, we can see to the proper restoration of its true meaning—for ourselves and our posterity, as somebody or other once said, I forget who.
And the America we lived in in 2001 bore little relation, freedom-wise, to that of the 1980s America, when the NeoCons/NeoLibs first came to power, the sons and daughters of the National Security State, itself born in 1947. So what we have here now is the result of the natural evolution of hegemonic anti-Constitutionalism. When I figured this out, some years ago, I stopped celebrating the Fourth of July - especially with fireworks made in plants owned by the People's Liberation Army (I'll bet someone is having a laugh about that one...). So far as I'm concerned, April 19 should be the day for remembrance, reflection, and action, July 4 was dead and gone long ago.
We should reflect on the Tenth Amendment: "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." This, as laid out by James Madison, was the original ambit of the Federal Government: "The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government, are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace, negotiation, and foreign commerce; with which last the power of taxation will for the most part be connected. The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people; and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State." Federalist Papers 45 and 46.
In the last 100 years or so, especially since 1937, when under FDR we had a bloodless coup which created a parallel government - see https://mises.org/library/revolution-was, and 1947 when a further gross arrogation of powers took place with the passage of the McCarran National Security Act and added powers to it, many of them secret (see https://www.cato.org/commentary/national-security-state). The interests of the several states and their peoples - "The powers reserved to the several States will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people; and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the State." were thus invaded and taken over by the parallel government and then the National Security State, neither of which had any Constitutional right to exist and were prohibited by the Tenth Amendment. And it continues on today, regardless of who is President: https://www.fff.org/explore-freedom/article/the-federal-coup-to-overthrow-the-states-and-nix-the-10th-amendment-is-underway/
So we need to remember these things - and this, from Federalist Paper 46: "Were it admitted, however, that the Federal government may feel an equal disposition with the State governments to extend its power beyond the due limits, the latter would still have the advantage in the means of defeating such encroachments. If an act of a particular State, though unfriendly to the national government, be generally popular in that State and should not too grossly violate the oaths of the State officers, it is executed immediately and, of course, by means on the spot and depending on the State alone. The opposition of the federal government, or the interposition of federal officers, would but inflame the zeal of all parties on the side of the State, and the evil could not be prevented or repaired, if at all, without the employment of means which must always be resorted to with reluctance and difficulty." Remember that next time you sing the Battle Hymn of the Republic... perhaps on the Fourth, perhaps after the Pledge in which case you assert that the Union is not federal, made up of a confederation of states, but is "one nation, indivisible".
In light of the words.plans, and hopes of the founders, if you think about it, considering what we have now, the whole thing falls to pieces, a glorious edifice which is little more than a crumbling stage set for a show which concluded its run some years back. But we know from where we started, and when and how we diverged from that path, and we can figure a path back, and we must. And that is what the Fourth of July should be for.